Becoming a citizen didn’t take much work in the early days of the United States. Under the Naturalization Act of 1790, then replaced with more clear guidelines spelled out in the Naturalization Act of 1795, it only took being white, free and having lived in the country for two years.

If those three criteria were met, the person could go before a judge, swear their allegiance to the United States and they and their children would become citizens.

Taking the census back then also was pretty simple. A person knocked on the door of a farmhouse, asked how many “free persons” lived there, whether they had any slaves, wrote the information down and went to the next farmhouse.

The census in recent years has become more a data-mining operation than a residency count. Remembering back to the 1990 census, questions about education levels and how many bathrooms were in the house were the part of the long form. Going back to that simpler time of just counting people would be welcoming.

Whether someone is a citizen is the latest debate on the census form, and as we wrote when the issue emerged in March 2018, there is nothing improper about asking it. Just as the intrusive long-form questions of censuses past, what becomes of the data in Big Brother’s hands is a legitimate concern.

Honestly, it would be nice to have an accurate count on how many illegal immigrants are in this country instead of relying on demographer’s guestimates. If that could be done without a fear of it resulting in roundups and internment camps as we had for the Japanese in World War II, the information would be useful.

If there is something to fear about the citizenship question, however, it is the dictatorial methods being considered to ensure it is asked.

During an interview Monday with The Associated Press, Attorney General William Barr said he expects in coming days to announce a way be believes will legally justify putting the question on census forms. He offered no details, because why spoil the surprise.

Whatever legal contortionism Barr devises, it will be an example of executive authoritarianism, one that should concern all of us regardless of party or ideology. The balance of power is fundamental to what makes America great, and overexertion of power by one branch in defiance of others could cause it all to crumble.

The U.S. Supreme Court recently blocked the question, at least temporarily, saying the administration’s justification for including it “seems to have been contrived.” Chief Justice John Roberts found the Commerce Department — and its Department of Justice defenders — had largely ignored provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act requiring it provide reasoned decision-making to support its actions.

Yet the administration believes President Donald Trump, writing a memo instructing the Commerce Department to include the question, is all that is required to make it so.

In other words, ignore the Supreme Court. Ignore the laws written by Congress. A fiat is all that is required.

Concerns over how many elected representatives each state will have seems moot if ruling by executive decree is the supreme law of the land. And as is the norm in the extremist perceptions of modern politics, those who spent eight years decrying “King Obama” are silent now.

It would be nice to return to the simpler times of our nation’s founding when the purpose of the census was merely to determine how many people live in the country — and when we were clear about not wanting to be ruled by a king.

Michael Morris is managing editor of The Facts. Contact him at 979-237-0144 or michael.morris@thefacts.com, or follow him on Twitter @factsmichael1.

(11) entries

Bulldog

President Trump is having supplemental forms printed up so they would be ready if he can LEGALLY get it on the census as time is critical. On a side note, time for Roberts to retire.

natives5

You want Roberts to retire because he is not super left leaning? You are sounding more and more like trump..."he didn't play my way so I hate him and want him gone!" Sounds like you do not believe in any sort of equal representation just a dictatorship.

AMP

How do you determine how many citizens a country has, unless you ask them if they are a citizen. The whole ploy, by the Democrats, is to count illegals as citizens in order to gain more representatives in the cities and states they control. These areas are the modern day plantations. Slavery is alive and well and ran by Democrats.

BillNancy

Everyone uses eleven million illegals are residing in the United States. No ones wants to reveal the true number of illegals for fear of a huge public backlash. However, the only way the left can win back governing the country is to overcome the power of the white vote. Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.

natives5

So is the "white vote" corrupt since they have the so-called power?

natives5

I too agree that everyone should be counted but with the racist in charge, we all know he wants to be able to divide us even further and manipulate the numbers to his benefit.

Bulldog

Your side is doing all the dividing.

natives5

Predictable reply from you.

Bulldog

I agree. I always reply with the truth.

PJBM626

Obama changed the questioning of the census years back and Morris and other left wing media were silent . Dems didn’t sue nor did weak Repubs complain. The law is law. Jesus said beware of the man of lawlessness We need to know whose legal and illegal. It’s the LAW It’s in the Constitution

natives5

I appreciate the laughs you provide....truth...haha.

Sign the guestbook.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.