During the last legislative session, a bill passed that prevents the state and local governments from working with abortion providers and affiliates. In Texas, this is no surprise, but it’s not likely there was a lot of that happening in the first place.

But the bill, authored by state Sen. Donna Campbell, ended up targeting a program used by about 33,000 employees across the state each year that sends millions of dollars to nonprofits, according to the Texas Tribune.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton this month issued a nonbinding legal opinion stating the State Employee Charitable Campaign that allows employees to send portions of their paychecks to nonprofits amounts to a taxpayer resource transaction, since the state payroll is funded by taxes. Under the new law barring state money going to abortion providers, employees no longer will be allowed to have money for Planned Parenthood automatically deducted.

With the action, Paxton and Campbell started pulling on a string, and it’s likely to take the whole sweater with it. And it has nothing to do with whether someone supports abortion — it’s whether they believe in the right of the state to dictate where citizens can donate their money.

The State Employee Charitable Campaign started in 1993 to allow state employees and retirees to directly contribute a portion of their paycheck to preapproved nonprofit organizations, of which there are about 1,100. Planned Parenthood, which provides health services and counseling to women in addition to pregnancy terminations, had been one of the options.

That was until Senate Bill 22, which prohibits local and state governments from conducting taxpayer-backed transactions with abortion providers or affiliates, according to the Texas Tribune. That law, in Paxton’s view, means Planned Parenthood needs to be stricken from the list.

The guidance is likely to wind up as kindling for a First Amendment challenge in court, just as it would if a Blue State deemed donations to the NRA equaled support for school shootings.

By approaching this issue from a moral standpoint, the government is opening itself to challenges on the other charities on that list of options. If someone disagreed with a certain religion or organization’s tactics, before all they had to do was choose to not donate to that organization. But now they can question why a special piece of legislation hasn’t been crafted for their personal objection.

The idea that this deduction is still the money of the state is a perversion. The deductions are not of government money, but instead hard-earned paychecks of Texans, and what happens to it should not be up to state leaders to dictate.

And that’s why this could end with no nonprofits getting funds in the future. Given the option of sending money to Planned Parenthood or sending it to no one, we easily can see state leaders opting for the latter and depriving the remaining 1,100 worthy charities of an easy source of donations.

There are lots of options for payroll deductions, and not everyone will agree with the practices or politics of every available choice. That does not mean the state should be allowed to take away the options it finds objectionable — and the rights of its employees to support the nonprofits it chooses in the process.

This editorial was written by Alec Woolsey, assistant managing editor of The Facts.

Recommended for you

(10) entries

Father of Six

I don't know that using the NRA analogy is applicable. Gun rights are protected in the Constitution, abortion was made legal by 8 men in robes. Your argument is a Trojan horse, but expected by the Fact's editorial board. The Facts is going the way of the NY Time, Washington Post, ect... Abortion is an abomination and of course the Facts supports it.


Page left dems and facts always like to portray Planned Parenthood as a health provider

What they are are baby killers then sell their parts for profit. They have been caught killing live babies from failed killing attempt. They break the law

I commend Texas for keeping money from this group of sick, murderous stain in our society

They kill 4000 babies a day. Hitler would be proud


Planned Parenthood provides many services including pregnancy testing, HIV testing, as well as women's and men's health services which includes cancer screening and birth control, so yes they are a health provider. Even your conspiracy sites say that they provide on average 887 abortions worldwide in a day; but those numbers don't bring the shock factor that you are looking for. You just like to spew random and false figures and hate, don't you? Your response is just pathetic and full of lies.

Father of Six

Yep, and Smith & Wesson makes holsters too.


Your children must be proud because you’ve actually listed a fact just like I did. Keep up the good work, Father of 6.


Agreed, Alec.


The abortion industry kill 4000 a day

800 plus a day from planned parenthood is more than Germans killed in their death camps on a daily basis. You leftist go crazy on one gun death and want action. But murdering 4000 a day means nothing to void souls


Just because you restate a lie doesn’t make it true. And more than 800 people a day were killed in the Holocaust. You won’t get ahead on this debate because you can’t understand facts; just fear and lies. Tsk tsk

Father of Six

He's not off by much natives5. In 2015 WHO reported 2800 per day in the US. You do believe them right? Sad and disgusting either way.


The CDC has a lower figure for that same period but my point was that PB&J likes to indulge figures and spread falsities. Seriously, Planned Parenthood "kills" more babies in a day than the German death camps....shock factor and still untrue.

Sign the guestbook.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.